Think of all the criminals whose lives we'll save.....
(c) 2013 by Tom King
|Call it an on-the-job safety measure for working burglars|
A similar study in England also found there were fewer "gun deaths" after they enacted gun laws. What they didn't tell you was that deaths by poisoning, bludgeoning, knife attacks and other means went up sufficiently to more than compensate for reductions in death by guns. There is actually evidence that the murder rate overall either climbed or did not change. In addition, crimes with handguns have doubled, gang-related gun crimes have exploded to the point that formerly unarmed British Bobbies are now carrying guns in self-defense. Ironic in that under the British gun laws, self-defense is not considered a good reason for getting a gun license.
I suspect if the American study had compared the "gun death" rate to the overall murder rate they would have found either no change in the murder rate or that murder rates rose (especially in more dangerous places like Chicago).
Murder is murder and, apparently, if you take away one weapon, people simply find other means to kill. So instead of being shot, you get bludgeoned to death. Is that somehow a better way to go? Oh, and by the way, you can't shoot back. So, if your attacker is larger than you, you will soon have no way to equalize things since you can't legally defend yourself with a gun. Gives the bad guys a sporting chance, what?
I have wondered how long it would take the anti-gun lobby to gin up this sort of study.
As Benjamin Disraeli once noted, "There are lies, damned lies and statistics."
I'll leave it to you to determine which category this latest "proof" belongs to.
I'm just sayin'