So toxic masculinity is real but there's no such thing as toxic femininity? Now, that hardly seems like it's fair to women. I think its downright discriminatory to say that women can't be as toxic as men, but that seems to be the narrative from feminists lately. I hesitated to post that link because the article is packed with unsourced "statistics", hyperbole and straw man logic fallacies, but it's the feminist narrative. Men bad, women good!
What balderdash! Sin is sin. In a fight men just happen to be bigger and more likely to win. And if a man does hold back from fighting with a women and gets himself clouted with a skillet for his trouble, he doesn't report it to the statistics police. If a man suffers abuse at the hands of his spouse and refuses to hit her back, that goes unreported. So on paper, women seem to be taking all the abuse. As it turns out those lopsided statistics are just that - lopsided.
It's not a masculinity problem, it's a sin problem and the feminist movement has set a trap for men by redefining what sin is. They told men traditional sexual values were out the window and that women want sex in the same way men do - setting off a sexual revolution that ignored thousands of years of human history altogether and cast off the protections women had won over millennia of civilization building. In the process of embracing sexual freedom, feminists have inadvertently given men permission to be pigs. The idea that women want "it" in the same way men do has created a mythos that has further encouraged the growth of a massive pornography industry; an industry that teaches generations of impressionable kids that abusing women is what women secretly want men to do to them. And if someone goes after the porn industry to shut it down, they're shouted down by the same forces of political correctness that claim women can't be toxic.
There's an old expression, "Hoist by his (or her) own petard." It means blown up by the bomb you were building. I think it's an appropriate expression here. It's the same leftist baloney that says people of color can't be racist and progressives can't exploit the masses.
Why?
Well...........because we say so!
© 2018 by Tom King
Why?
Well...........because we say so!
© 2018 by Tom King
1 comment:
That is indeed quite a mix of concepts and ideas all together.
I don't see abuse, sexual freedom, and equal rights as dependent on each other. Also, you lumped in porn, and sin. Nah.
Abuse: Don't abuse women. Don't abuse men.
Porn: Is not abuse. Certainly what I watch has no abuse in it.
Equal Rights: Are not in any way required to be tied to sexual freedom.
Sexual Freedom: Great for the men, not so much for the women. Because we value different things. Men want sex. Don't care about the rest of it as much. Women want all kinds of things, but don't care about sex as much. Men give love/attention to get sex. Women give sex to get love/attention.
WHY, for the love of god, would us men do all the rest of everything else if we can just get immediate sex. From multiple women?
Sin: Well. This is something for debate. Your perception is for SURE that it matters, 'cause you are a someone that believes in the bible. I don't, and thus, the concept of what is, and is not is a sin, is not relevant to me.
Post a Comment