Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Russians Squeeze NASA for More Bucks

(c) 2013 by Tom King

Dragon X Commercial Space Vehicle
successfully docks with Space Station
The price just went up on the cost of getting American astronauts into space.  The price of shipping our astronauts to the space station via Russia's "spam in a can" Soyuz capsule just increased from 62.3 million per seat to 70 million per seat.  

Thanks to this brilliant move, NASA is stuck hitching rides with the Russkies until at least 2017 - a deal which puts American astronauts in the hands of 1970s Russian technology in order to reach the space station. 

And the left is, of course, still blaming it on George Bush.

 I had intended to make some comment about how the Obama Administration's new goals for NASA had switched from space exploration to making Muslim nations feel good about themselves and their contribution to science, but let's let the president's choice for NASA head honcho speak for himself:




Note that none of the three initiatives the president charged Bolden with has anything to do directly with space exploration. It's all about political agenda.  The first thing NASA did under the Obama Administration in 2009 was cut the Orion crew size and delay the project for years, guaranteeing we continue to rely on the Russians to get our guys into space for close to a decade.

Notice that the evil commercial sector which is busily "lining its pockets", has already launched freight carrying space vehicles that cost NASA half what it's own rockets cost, delivering bigger and bigger payloads.  The Dragon X manned capsule will be ready long before Orion is. Space planes and inflatable hotels in space are already in the offing. 




And care to guess which president pushed hardest for NASA to open the doors to commercial space flight?

Meanwhile Obama's NASA will be busily "inspiring" children to "get into" science rather like they get into video games and rap music.  And the boss, Director Bolden, will be wandering around the middle east looking for ways to make the Muslims feel good about their contributions to science (his words).

Don't get me wrong. I do appreciate Arab contributions to science like unpronounceable names for constellation and that whole Arabic numerals thing.  Technically though they should be called "Hindu-Arabic numerals" because the Persians and Arabs borrowed them from their Hindu inventors (rather before any of your actual Arabs and Persians actually became your actual Muslims).  We are grateful that the Arabs, by then Muslim, passed Arab numerals along to the west no matter that they were misnamed.

Westerners grabbed onto the new number system instantly - probably because they were stuck trying to multiply CMLXXXVII times MDCLXXVIII  (the answer has something like 1,656 "M's" in it).  So let me formally thank the Middle East for 0 through 9.  Right handy it's been all in all. Without it we'd have had a right job of it to figure out which shuttle mission was STS-CXXXV.  And think of all the money NASA has saved on hiring the guys that paint the lettering on the spaceships, not to mention the cranes, the vehicle assembly building and the catering trucks. 859 takes a lot less paint than does DCCCLIX. 

At the rate things are going, I fully expect the greedy capitalists to be back on the moon long before NASA can figure out which Middle-Eastern leader most needs to be reassured that Islam has contributed to "science".  I'm sure, however, that millions of children will be "inspired" to "go into" science by NASA's new propaganda mission.  When NASA finally finds its way to Mars, they'll be able to land their one way space pod full of "inspired" kids in the parking lot of a Martian McDonald's right between a Ford orbital shuttle and a BMW interplanetary cruiser. 

Good plan, Big "O".  Really great plan.

I'm just saying.

Tom King

* Don't get me wrong. I think the Arabic numeral system was a peachy idea, but that predated Islam and actually they should be called Hindu-Arabic numerals because the whole idea originally came from India and was borrowed by the Arabs who lent it to people whose brains were fried from trying to multiply MCLXXXVII times MDCLXXVIII. 

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Collectivism - Bah, Humbug!


Conservative ideas are like fertilizer.
Spread them around to make things grow.
Here are a some recent new articles I've written in other media (spreading the joy around so to speak). 

1.  On Collectivism:  The Marxist/Socialist/Collectivists among us make me tired. So "What's Wrong With Collectivism?",  you ask.

2.   On Terrorism: Should We Give Evil People a Podium?

3.  On Conspiracy Nuts:  A Merrier World Indeed 

Finally, I want to thank my liberal and libertarian buds who harangue me constantly and in the process, do manage to give me plenty of stuff to write about.

Have a lovely weekend.

Tom King (c) 2013



Thursday, April 25, 2013

Government Inherently Good? Are You Kidding Me?

Harry Reid says, "Government is inherently good."

Let's take a closer look at that claim.  Government is inherently good,huh?
  • Tell that to the six million holocaust victims and six million German citizens exterminated by Adolph Hitler.
  • Tell that to the 43 million plus victims of Joltin' Jo Stalin and the overall 62 million for the Soviet Union 1917-1987.
  • Tell that to the 40-70 million executed, starved and worked to death by Chairman Mao.
  • Tell that to the untold millions killed in the Hundred Years War, The 30 Years War, The War of the Roses, The Crusades, The uncountable jihads, WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Kuwait, the Gulf Wars, terrorist attacks and brush wars everywhere.
  • Tell that to those who lived under Napoleon, who were slaughtered by Ghengis Khan and who died at the hands of twisted emperors like Nero, Caligula, Commodus, Domitian and Elagabalus. 
  • The 75,000 Muslims massacred by Ferdinand Marcos
  • The one million killed in Ethiopia by the Marxist Regime in the 80s.
  • The 600,000 ethnic Chinese killed by the Indonesian government in the early 60s.
  • The 2 million Cambodians murdered by Pol Pot in the killing fields.
  • The 800,000 Tutsi and Hutu "dissidents" slaughtered by Rwanda's Hutu government in the 90s.
  • The 200,000 Muslims murdered by the Serbian government in the 90s.
  • The 2 million Armenians exterminated by the Ottoman Empire in the early years of the 20th century.
  • The 10,000 people who hurled themselves from cliffs as ordered by Japanese Emperor Hirohito because he was afraid US forces would treat the so well after the conquest that it would be bad PR and lessen the "fighting spirit" of Japanese mainlanders.
  • The 300,00 Chinese men, women and children brutalized, raped and murdered by Japanese troops in Nanking China.
  • The 40,000 Frenchmen who died on the orders of Maximilien Robespierre.
  • The 30,000 Iranians executed for having incorrect political opinions by the Ayatollah Khomeini.
  • The 500,000 killed by Idi Amin Dada, the lunatic that ran Uganda for many years.
  • The 3 million Congolese killed, maimed and tortured by King Leopold II of Belgium at end of the 1800s and early 1900s.
  • Oliver Cromwell's extermination of one fifth of the entire population of Ireland.
  • The 10,000 Romanians that Vlad III, King of Romania impaled for his amusement on large pointed stakes round his castle.
  • The one thousand citizens of Novgorod who were daily executed in front of the castle while Ivan the Terrible and his family watched the festivities.  The people were suspected of being about to run away from Russia.
  • Saddam Hussein's gassing and mass murder of some 600,000 Iraqi citizens.
  • Kim Il Sung's genocide which took 1.6 million victims.
  • And that's the short list.....

Now, once again, Senator, tell me again how a big powerful government is inherently good.

Tom King (c) 2013