Biden Authorizes Mass Murder of Undocumented Immigrants

Just because they're birds doesn't make it right!

Hoo me? You talkin' about me?

Sounds hypocritical to me. Washington State, Oregon and California, in cahoots with the Federal Fish and Wildlife Service are planning the genocide of half a million Barred Owls which have apparently been classified as undocumented owls! Illegal aliens if you will.

Me? I'm an open borders for birds guy. Just let them come after the sweet pair of barred owls that hoot at us every spring outside our window at night! It is ironic that the leftist government in Washington is doing the following:

1. Declaring a whole race of owls that moved in here naturally to be unwanted illegal immigrants. I thought Democrats liked illegal aliens!

2. As a result of this anti-immigrant policy and the state's racist spotted owl supremacy stance, they have planned to commit genocide against barred owls based on their race.

3. They are talking about authorizing men with gun to go from tree to tree murdering innocent owls.

4. For people who believe in evolution and the survival of the fittest, they sure have a prejudice in favor of the survival of the demonstrably weak spotted owl population.

5. They didn't ask the rest of us if we wanted to turn Washington State et al into owl Auschwitz. They plan to play enticing owl sounds on loudspeakers and the shoot them when they fly in looking for a hot date.

6. And the story says Joe Biden basically issued the kill order.

Here's the story.

https://komonews.com/news/local/west-coast-spotted-owl-potential-extinction-kill-bared-owls-us-fish-wildlife-service-oregon-washington-california?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0SAXBCJE2LeWkHmfSEw1pVsIE49sPjuY7DJl23vyGUOJ8eTdH04MXiafM_aem_TRWz-cteEV5y0cUzh4fSmg#

These guys keep the giant ship rat population in check here near Puget Sound.
Government assassins beware. I will protect my feathered neighbors!

© 2024 by Tom King

The Need for Immigration Triage

FDR turned away German Jews seeking asylum prior to WWII.
Are we going to repeat that shameful episode?

I'm hearing a lot of pushback from the left over Trump's policy of placing a priority on admitting Christian refugees from places like Syria, calling it a "religious" test for admittance. It's no such thing anymore than it is a policy of excluding people by nationality. After all, we wouldn't have imported large numbers of Germans or Japanese or even Italians during WWII. And folks, we are at war with ISIS. It's just that they've declared war on us and our past president kept pretending they hadn't.


Prioritizing Christians from Syria would be rather like putting a priority on Tutsis during the Rwandan genocide by Hutu forces. Would liberals have complained that it was a "racial" test? It's no such thing. It's saving the people who are in the greatest danger and making sure you don't "rescue" the very people that want to slaughter them. 

And don't tell me there's no risk. A Coptic Christian from Egypt was beheaded in New York by a Muslim jihadi from Egypt. We've seen Muslim extremists come to the States and carry out honor killings against American Muslim girls. Just one incident like this is too many. 

We need a common sense immigration and refugee policy. What we have now is muddle-headed chaos based, not on the threat to refugees, but on the immediate past president's need for virtue signaling. People are dying. We can help. Saving Christians isn't about a religious test. It's triage. It's like if a boat sinks and rescuers start plucking the drowning people out of the water first and THEN going around to pull out the people wearing life jackets. It's a needs test, not a religious test. Christians are being murdered and persecuted because of their religion. How hard is that to understand?

© 2017 by Tom King

The Nullification Principle: Nonbelievers Declare War

In arithmetic if you multiply anything by zero, the result is zero. Apparently certain atheist groups believe a similar principle should apply in public life.  If anyone, they argue, who believes in something "religious", crosses paths with someone who believes in nothing, then nothing in the way of belief may be expressed lest he who believes in nothing be offended. Recent lawsuits seem to indicate that offended nonbelievers trump offended believers in the new social order being promoted here.

Actually the Apostle Paul does counsel us to do our best not to offend our "weaker" brethren by the exercise of our beliefs so far as possible. I believe Paul may have anticipated a time when the very sight of the faithful or any symbol of faith would offend those who have no faith, but he writes about it elsewhere. Jesus warned us that if they did it to Him, we should expect that they will do it to us. By they, He referred to any militant religious force with a hunger for power.  From the Sanhedrin, to the god-emperors of Rome to the virulent anti-religion forces in this country, each has declared war on the Christian faith (and all other faiths for that matter at one time or another). They call, not for freedom of religion, but for freedom from religion or at least universal adherence to their brand of religiosity. As in the days of the Roman, German, Chinese, Russian, Cambodian, Rwandan, Sudanese and Serbian genocides, they are in deadly earnest about removing all trace of it from human cultures.

They aren't talking genocide yet, but wait for it.

Religion in militant atheist circles draws the blame for everything bad that has ever happened in the history of the world.  Religion is blamed for wars, for famines, for plagues pestilence and genocide. It matters not that each of these atrocities have been perpetrated almost entirely by governments -- frequently masquerading as acting on religious principles, yes -- but governments nonetheless. Let us remember the 21st century death toll credited to governments who formally proclaimed their atheism.  Between China and the USSR alone, some 200 to 300 million died to feed the paranoia of governments without a God.

Given the vehemence with which they go after even innocuous symbols of faith, one wonders what would happen if we gave them more power - oh, say a formally atheist socialist government.  Socialism/communism does seem to be the government of choice for the majority of the world's atheists these days.



© 2013 by Tom King

Government Inherently Good? Are You Kidding Me?

Harry Reid says, "Government is inherently good."

Let's take a closer look at that claim.  Government is inherently good,huh?

• Tell that to the six million holocaust victims and six million German citizens exterminated by Adolph Hitler.
• Tell that to the 43 million plus victims of Joltin' Jo Stalin and the overall 62 million for the Soviet Union 1917-1987.
• Tell that to the 40-70 million executed, starved and worked to death by Chairman Mao.
• Tell that to the untold millions killed in the Hundred Years War, The 30 Years War, The War of the Roses, The Crusades, The uncountable jihads, WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Kuwait, the Gulf Wars, terrorist attacks and brush wars everywhere.
• Tell that to those who lived under Napoleon, who were slaughtered by Ghengis Khan and who died at the hands of twisted emperors like Nero, Caligula, Commodus, Domitian and Elagabalus. 
• The 75,000 Muslims massacred by Ferdinand Marcos
• The one million killed in Ethiopia by the Marxist Regime in the 80s.
• The 600,000 ethnic Chinese killed by the Indonesian government in the early 60s.
• The 2 million Cambodians murdered by Pol Pot in the killing fields.
• The 800,000 Tutsi and Hutu "dissidents" slaughtered by Rwanda's Hutu government in the 90s.
• The 200,000 Muslims murdered by the Serbian government in the 90s.
• The 2 million Armenians exterminated by the Ottoman Empire in the early years of the 20th century.
• The 10,000 people who hurled themselves from cliffs as ordered by Japanese Emperor Hirohito because he was afraid US forces would treat the so well after the conquest that it would be bad PR and lessen the "fighting spirit" of Japanese mainlanders.
• The 300,00 Chinese men, women and children brutalized, raped and murdered by Japanese troops in Nanking China.
• The 40,000 Frenchmen who died on the orders of Maximilien Robespierre.
• The 30,000 Iranians executed for having incorrect political opinions by the Ayatollah Khomeini.
• The 500,000 killed by Idi Amin Dada, the lunatic that ran Uganda for many years.
• The 3 million Congolese killed, maimed and tortured by King Leopold II of Belgium at end of the 1800s and early 1900s.
• Oliver Cromwell's extermination of one fifth of the entire population of Ireland.
• The 10,000 Romanians that Vlad III, King of Romania impaled for his amusement on large pointed stakes round his castle.
• The one thousand citizens of Novgorod who were daily executed in front of the castle while Ivan the Terrible and his family watched the festivities.  The people were suspected of being about to run away from Russia.
• Saddam Hussein's gassing and mass murder of some 600,000 Iraqi citizens.
• Kim Il Sung's genocide which took 1.6 million victims.
• And that's the short list.....

Now, once again, Senator, tell me again how a big powerful government is inherently good.

Tom King (c) 2013